Taxi alternatives

Best Taxi for Email alternatives

The best alternative depends on how your team builds, reviews, and exports campaigns. This comparison covers Better Email, Dyspatch, Knak, Stripo, and Chamaileon without pretending that one tool is right for every team.

Taxi for Email has not announced that it is shutting down. If Taxi works for your team, there is no shutdown related deadline to move. Read our sourced Taxi status article before treating rumours as a reason to change platforms.

Which option fits which team?

Start with the production model you want. Then check the detailed comparisons before making a shortlist.

Better Email

What it is good at: Code controlled Email Design Systems, visual campaign creation, approvals, localization, testing, and export to the sending platform your team already uses.
Who it suits: Enterprise marketing teams and agencies that want developers to control HTML and Liquid while marketers build campaigns from protected modules.
When it may be the better choice: Choose Better Email when several markets, brands, or approval groups need one governed production workflow, or when your team wants direct control of the email code.

Compare Better Email and Taxi

Dyspatch

What it is good at: Coded, brand locked blocks in DML, shareable previews, and content creation across email, SMS, push, and in app messages.
Who it suits: Teams with a working DML setup, a relatively simple approval flow, or a need to create several messaging channels in one builder.
When it may be the better choice: Dyspatch may be the better choice when multichannel creation matters more than using HTML and Liquid for the design system.

Compare Better Email and Dyspatch

Knak

What it is good at: A fully visual enterprise workflow for email and landing pages, with standard blocks, brand controls, comments, review groups, and staged approvals.
Who it suits: Teams that want administrators and marketers to configure and use the platform without developer involvement.
When it may be the better choice: Knak may be the better choice when a visual setup, landing pages, and standard content blocks cover the work your team needs.

Compare Better Email and Knak

Stripo

What it is good at: Fast setup from a large template library, drag and drop editing, HTML and CSS access, interactive email features, and broad ESP export.
Who it suits: Individuals and smaller teams that want a flexible general purpose builder for one off campaigns.
When it may be the better choice: Stripo may be the better choice when speed, ready made templates, interactive email features, and broad export matter more than a governed enterprise design system.

Compare Better Email and Stripo

Chamaileon

What it is good at: Collaborative, no code email building with workflow features.
Who it suits: Teams that prioritise collaborative visual email creation without a code owned design system.
When it may be the better choice: Chamaileon may be the better choice when a collaborative no code builder is the main requirement.

When Better Email is the right choice

Better Email fits teams that want developers to own the Email Design System in HTML and Liquid while marketers build campaigns in a visual editor. It also fits enterprise teams and agencies that need comments, approvals, localization, testing, and ESP export in the same production workflow.

When another option is better

Choose Dyspatch for a DML based multichannel workflow. Choose Knak for a fully visual enterprise setup with landing pages. Choose Stripo for quick template creation and interactive email features. Consider Chamaileon when collaborative no code building is the main requirement.

See what a move from Taxi involves

We can review your current campaigns and show how the same production model works in Better Email before you make a decision.

Switch from Taxi Request a demo